If you live in a rural area in the U.S., you will have to do postal banking because the U.S. Post Office will soon become your bank.
Some of my early readers may recall that I have been writing about postal banking for over four years.
At the time, postal banking sounded like a far-fetch idea, even to me.
The fact is, postal banking isn’t a new idea for some Senators who have discovered that nearly 28% of U.S. households are either unbanked or under-banked.
Therefore, they want to turn U.S. Post Offices (back) into banks.
Some Senators are looking at adding banking to U.S. Post Offices.
Their theory is that this lack of access to affordable financial services drives the working poor to rely on costly and often predatory alternatives.
But, what if a trusted, accessible, and secure government agency (that receives no tax dollars for operating expenses) with the world’s largest retail network (31,000 branches serving every urban, suburban, and rural community in the country) existed that could help fill this void?
It does exist.
It’s the U.S. Postal Service.
While the idea of postal banking is not a new one, it got a big boost in 2014 with the publication of a white paper from the USPS Office of Inspector General.
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have voiced support, as well as the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
It’s backed by the four unions representing postal workers and a growing list of financial reform, civil rights, and consumer/citizen groups.
According to Warren, “If the Postal Service offered basic banking services, nothing fancy, just basic bill paying, check cashing and small dollar loans, then it could provide affordable financial services for under-served families, and, at the same time, shore up its own financial footing.”
Post offices are located in bank deserts.
Banks closed 2,300 branches in 2012 alone.
Of the bank branch closings between late 2008 and 2012, 93 percent have been in zip codes with below-national median household levels (rural areas).
While banks may be abandoning locations where the under-served live, post offices are not.
More than a third (38%) of post offices in the United States are in zip codes without a single bank.
Almost a quarter more (21%) are in zip codes with only one bank.
Post offices have an established relationship with the unbanked.
Whereas, many unbanked individuals have never stepped foot in a bank, post offices are familiar to many without a bank account.
In unbanked neighborhoods, the most common transaction in post offices is money orders, which are especially beneficial to those without bank accounts.
The postal service sold 109 million money orders in 2012, and is the leader in the U.S. domestic paper money order market.
This product flourishes without any marketing strategy by the Postal Service, simply because it fills a need.
Post offices are trusted.
A 2013 survey found that only 26 percent of the American public has much confidence in U.S. banks, contrasted with 68 percent agreeing that the postal service is reliable and trustworthy.
The U.S. Postal Service was identified as the fourth most trusted company in the United States, and the most trusted federal entity when it comes to privacy.
And, in a November 2014 Gallup survey, 72 percent of Americans and 81 percent of those 18 to 29, say the U.S. Postal Service is doing an excellent or good job.
Along with domestic and international money orders, the postal service offers electronic money transfers, and prepaid gift cards.
Postal retail clerks receive significant classroom and on-the-job training as well as yearly certification.
In addition to handling money orders, transfers and debit cards, postal window clerks providing non-bank financial services for the under-served.
From 1911 to 1967, the U.S. Post Office offered savings deposits accounts.
Early on, the program was particularly popular with recent immigrants, many of whom came from countries with postal banking.
During the Great Depression, the system grew in popularity as it was a safer place to save than unregulated and failing banks.
At its peak in 1947, more than 4 million customers had accounts with deposits totaling $3.4 billion.
Deposits declined as traditional banks increased interest rates, as a period of tighter regulation was ushered in, and as U.S. savings bonds (also with higher interest rates) grew in popularity.
Many postal systems around the world, including France, Germany, Japan, China, Brazil, India, and New Zealand offer financial services and play important roles in advancing financial inclusion.
In addition, financial services accounted for 14.5 percent of revenue for postal organizations in industrialized countries in 2012.
Offering financial services via the U.S. Postal System will not single-handed solve income inequality in the United States.
The postal service would better serve the needs of potential customers and the nation, because it won’t victimize customers.
Non-profit postal banking could help struggling families, and the USPS achieve financial stability.
It would be a tremendous step forward for the country.
The Washington Post wrote an interesting and thought-provoking article:
“The increasingly pressing question of the unbanked — and financial access more broadly — has become inescapable in light of the recent obstacles to delivering stimulus checks. Faced with the economic challenges of covid-19, the federal government attempted to provide struggling Americans with some income — and the broader economy with much-needed stimulus — by issuing $1,200 payments to many people. “
Final thoughts: Just to be a little mysterious and prime you for a future article about Social Security, remember $1,200.
Stay well and let’s talk again, soon. 🙂 T.